Hernandez v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hernandez v. Hernandez

77 A.D.2d 796, 430 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 796 (Hernandez v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. Hernandez, 77 A.D.2d 796, 430 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The record fully supports the court’s dismissal of the complaint, the granting of defendant’s counterclaim for divorce on the ground of adultery, and the award of custody of the children to defendant with liberal visitation rights to plaintiff. The evidence of the relative stability and responsibility of the parents justified the court’s determination that the best interests of the children lie in their custody by the father. There is no merit to the contention that plaintiff was denied effective assistance of counsel and a fair trial. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—divorce.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The record fully supports the court’s dismissal of the complaint, the granting of defendant’s counterclaim for divorce on the ground of adultery, and the award of custody of the children to defendant with liberal visitation rights to plaintiff. The evidence of the relative stability and responsibility of the parents justified the court’s determination that the best interests of the children lie in their custody by the father. There is no merit to the contention that plaintiff was denied effective assistance of counsel and a fair trial. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—divorce.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.2d 796, 430 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-hernandez-nyappdiv-1980.