Hernandez v. Hernandez

679 So. 2d 57, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9247, 1996 WL 496959
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hernandez v. Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 645 So. 2d 171
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 4, 1996·No. No. 96-1404·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm a temporary order modifying custody. On the record before the court, we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s concluding, after fourteen hours of hearing, that it was in the best interest of the child to reside temporarily with the father. As to all issues raised, there is sufficient evidence to support this exercise of discretion. We note that there is no question here that Appellant had sufficient notice and ample opportunity to be heard.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. Hernandez, 679 So. 2d 57, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9247, 1996 WL 496959 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 57 (Hernandez v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.