Hernandez v. Florida Orthopedics Inc.

861 So. 2d 525, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19534, 2003 WL 23008834
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 24, 2003·No. No. 3D03-475·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Francis Hernandez (“Hernandez”) appeals a Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission’s affirmance of an appeals referee’s decision ’denying Hernandez unemployment benefits. The basis for the denial of benefits was “misconduct” connected to work. See § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2002). Accepting the findings of fact made by the appeals referee, we conclude although Hernandez’s tardiness in reporting to work on several occasions was “more than sufficient cause to justify his termination from his job, it clearly does not rise to the level of ‘misconduct’ necessary so as to deprive him of unemployment benefits.” See Santiago v. Home Depot USA, Inc., 716 So.2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Accordingly, we reverse the order below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. Florida Orthopedics Inc., 861 So. 2d 525, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19534, 2003 WL 23008834 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

861 So. 2d 525 (Hernandez v. Florida Orthopedics Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reaves v. ANC Rental Corp.
871 So. 2d 1069 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)