Hernandez v. FANTOM WIRE, INC.

728 N.W.2d 81, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 112, 2007 WL 696654
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided March 1, 2007·No. A06-2260·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 31, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. FANTOM WIRE, INC., 728 N.W.2d 81, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 112, 2007 WL 696654 (Mich. 2007).

728 N.W.2d 81 (Hernandez v. FANTOM WIRE, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)