Hernandez v. FANTOM WIRE, INC.

728 N.W.2d 81, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 112, 2007 WL 696654
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedMarch 1, 2007
DocketA06-2260
StatusPublished

This text of 728 N.W.2d 81 (Hernandez v. FANTOM WIRE, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. FANTOM WIRE, INC., 728 N.W.2d 81, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 112, 2007 WL 696654 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 31, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that, [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Paul H. Anderson Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 N.W.2d 81, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 112, 2007 WL 696654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-fantom-wire-inc-minn-2007.