Hernandez v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hernandez v. Coombe

228 A.D.2d 760, 643 N.Y.2d 724, 643 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6417

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 228 A.D.2d 760 (Hernandez v. Coombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. Coombe, 228 A.D.2d 760, 643 N.Y.2d 724, 643 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

As the result of an incident in which petitioner allegedly threw feces at the cell of another inmate, petitioner was found guilty of committing an unhygienic act. He challenges this determination arguing, inter alia, that it is not supported by substantial evidence. We find this contention to be without merit. The misbehavior report, coupled with the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it and who conducted his own independent investigation of the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination. Petitioner was not entitled to access to information provided by the confidential source in this case and such information did not, in any event, provide a basis for the administrative determination. We have considered petitioner’s other claims and find that they are either unpreserved for review or lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

As the result of an incident in which petitioner allegedly threw feces at the cell of another inmate, petitioner was found guilty of committing an unhygienic act. He challenges this determination arguing, inter alia, that it is not supported by substantial evidence. We find this contention to be without merit. The misbehavior report, coupled with the testimony of the correction officer who prepared it and who conducted his own independent investigation of the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination. Petitioner was not entitled to access to information provided by the confidential source in this case and such information did not, in any event, provide a basis for the administrative determination. We have considered petitioner’s other claims and find that they are either unpreserved for review or lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

228 A.D.2d 760, 643 N.Y.2d 724, 643 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-coombe-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack