Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

2016 NY Slip Op 7602, 144 A.D.3d 501, 40 N.Y.S.3d 764
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 2016·No. 2207 301327/09·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard H. Sherman, J.), entered September 24, 2015, which granted defendant Danella Construction of NY, Inc.’s motion to reduce the damages portion of the verdict and order a new trial of damages unless plaintiff stipulated to accept the reduced damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury’s award for pain and suffering deviated materially from reasonable compensation for the injuries sustained by plaintiff (CPLR 5501 [c]). The award for future medical expenses was not supported by the trial evidence (see e.g. Hyatt v Metro-North Commuter R.R., 16 AD3d 218, 219 [1st Dept 2005]).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 7602, 144 A.D.3d 501, 40 N.Y.S.3d 764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 7602 (Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hyatt v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
16 A.D.3d 218 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)