Home/New York Court of Appeals/Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co.

Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co.

65 N.Y. 857
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 5, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 65 N.Y. 857 (Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co., 65 N.Y. 857 (N.Y. 1985).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs (see, Strauss v Belle Realty Co., 65 NY2d 399; see also, Nicholson v City of New York, 271 App Div 899, affd 297 NY 548). Question certified not answered as unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye; Judges Jasen and Meyer on constraint of Strauss v Belle Realty Co. (65 NY2d 399). Taking no part: Judges Alexander and Titone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nicholson v. City of N.Y., N.Y. Queens Elec. Light
74 N.E.2d 477 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 N.Y. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-consolidated-edison-co-ny-1985.