Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co.
65 N.Y. 857
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see, Strauss v Belle Realty Co., 65 NY2d 399; see also, Nicholson v City of New York, 271 App Div 899, affd 297 NY 548). Question certified not answered as unnecessary.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye; Judges Jasen and Meyer on constraint of Strauss v Belle Realty Co. (65 NY2d 399). Taking no part: Judges Alexander and Titone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co., 65 N.Y. 857 (N.Y. 1985).
65 N.Y. 857 (Hernandez v. Consolidated Edison Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nicholson v. City of N.Y., N.Y. Queens Elec. Light
74 N.E.2d 477 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)