Hernandez v. Commonwealth

668 N.E.2d 843, 423 Mass. 1012, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 211
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedAugust 16, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 668 N.E.2d 843 (Hernandez v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. Commonwealth, 668 N.E.2d 843, 423 Mass. 1012, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 211 (Mass. 1996).

Opinion

Jose Hernandez (defendant) unsuccessfully sought a stay of proceedings [1013]*1013in the Appeals Court pending a decision on his motion under Mass. R. Crim. P. 30 (b), 378 Mass. 900 (1979), for a new trial. A single justice of this court denied his request for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), and he then sought review in the full court under S.J.C. Rule 2:21, 421 Mass. 1303 (1995).

The case was submitted on the papers filed, accompanied by a memorandum of law. Jose Hernandez, pro se. S. Jane Haggerty, Assistant District Attorney, for the Commonwealth.

The appeal from which the defendant sought a stay was the subject of oral argument in the Appeals Court on April 18, 1996.1 The defendant has not demonstrated what remedy, if any, could have been obtained thereafter from either the single justice or from this court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 3
Massachusetts § 3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
668 N.E.2d 843, 423 Mass. 1012, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-commonwealth-mass-1996.