Hernandez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

CourtDistrict Court, D. Oregon
DecidedJune 19, 2020
Docket3:19-cv-01353-IM
StatusUnknown

This text of Hernandez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Hernandez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2020).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF OREGON

JULIO HERNANDEZ, Civil No. 3:19-CV-01353-IM

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Defendant.

1. The Commissioner is directed to pay EAJA fees in the amount of $4,453.93. 2. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010), payment of the award, after offset of qualifying federal debt under the Treasury Offset Program, shall be made payable to Plaintiff and shall be mailed to Plaintiff’s attorney, D. James Tree, 3711 Englewood Avenue, Yakima, Washington 98902. 3. If Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset under the Treasury Offset Program, payment of the entire award shall be payable directly to Mr. Tree and mailed to the address above or, or direct deposited into the Tree Law Office account, because Plaintiff has assigned any Court awarded EAJA attorney’s fees to Mr. Tree. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this this 19th day of June, 2020.

/s/ Karin J. Immergut Karin J. Immergut United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hernandez v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-commissioner-social-security-administration-ord-2020.