Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
JANEL M. HERNANDEZ,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 6:22-cv-2313-RBD-PDB
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. ____________________________________
ORDER In this Social Security appeal, Plaintiff challenges the denial of her application for benefits. (Doc. 1.) On referral, U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale recommends affirming the Commissioner’s decision. (Doc. 21 (“R&R”).) The parties did not object and the time has passed, so the Court examines the R&R for clear error only. See Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App’x 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006). Finding none, the R&R is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. The R&R (Doc. 21) is ADOPTED AND CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order in its entirety. 2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. 3. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and then to close the file. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on January 2, 2024.
vd ROY B. DALTON, United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security (Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.