Hernandez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hernandez v. City of New York

52 A.D.2d 553, 382 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 20, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 553 (Hernandez v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. City of New York, 52 A.D.2d 553, 382 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on October 17, 1974, in favor of plaintiffs, after a jury trial, in the total sum of $204,638.12, unanimously affirmed. Plaintiffs-respondents shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The evidence adduced in support of plaintiffs’ case supports the verdict on the issues of liability and damages. On the instant record we cannot conclude, as appellant contends, that the alleged misconduct of plaintiffs’ counsel deprived the city of a fair trial and affected the result reached. In such connection, we note that the principal improprieties now asserted were not objected to below, nor was a mistrial requested. Concur— Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Birns and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on October 17, 1974, in favor of plaintiffs, after a jury trial, in the total sum of $204,638.12, unanimously affirmed. Plaintiffs-respondents shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The evidence adduced in support of plaintiffs’ case supports the verdict on the issues of liability and damages. On the instant record we cannot conclude, as appellant contends, that the alleged misconduct of plaintiffs’ counsel deprived the city of a fair trial and affected the result reached. In such connection, we note that the principal improprieties now asserted were not objected to below, nor was a mistrial requested. Concur— Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Birns and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 553, 382 N.Y.S.2d 460, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1976.