Hernandez v. . Brookdale Mills, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Hernandez v. . Brookdale Mills, Inc.

134 N.E. 568, 232 N.Y. 552, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 584

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 13, 1921

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 134 N.E. 568 (Hernandez v. . Brookdale Mills, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hernandez v. . Brookdale Mills, Inc., 134 N.E. 568, 232 N.Y. 552, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 584 (N.Y. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

The question certified is answered in the negative. Upon the facts appearing in this record the court at least had the power as a matter of discretion to make provision as it did for payment of the commissions and expenses of the receiver. We do not pass upon the disposition of such items under other circumstances.

His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI