Hernandez v. Bozzuto's, Inc.

Opinion

□□ yf SONY fi UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ii nai SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UMENT CHAN OR OER KS cmewen cesnes SNOT RONICALLY BIEEH. Il HUGO HORACIO ZUNIGA HERNANDEZ, OO A: 4 : \DATE FILED: 5-90-92 35 | Pant a! -against- 25-cv-4131 (LAK)

BOZZUTO’S, INC., et ano., Defendants. eee ee ee ee eee eee ee re ree eer re HK

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: oy The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, ¢.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). Oo The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). Oo The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before May 29, 2025o0f an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Dated: May 20, 2025 hee: Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge