Hernandez v. Board of Education

302 A.D.2d 493, 755 N.Y.S.2d 253
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 18, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 302 A.D.2d 493 (Hernandez v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez v. Board of Education, 302 A.D.2d 493, 755 N.Y.S.2d 253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated November 26, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, then a sixth-grade student, was injured when a fellow student allegedly intentionally tripped him during a graduation ceremony rehearsal.

The defendant sustained its burden of establishing that it had no actual or constructive notice of prior, similar misconduct (see Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44 [1994]). Even assuming, as the plaintiff contends, that the fellow student had prior disciplinary problems that were reported to school officials, the disciplinary problems were not of a nature to place the defendant on notice of the instant situation (see Morman v Ossining Union Free School Dist., 297 AD2d 788, 789 [2002]; Janukajtis v Fallon, 284 AD2d 428, 430 [2001]). In addition, there is no evidence to establish that any purported negligence on the defendant’s part was the proximate cause of the injuries. [494]*494According to the plaintiffs testimony, the fellow student, who was standing behind him in line, tripped him by stepping on his heel. Under the circumstances, the incident happened in “so short a span of time that ‘even the most intense supervision could not have prevented it’ ” (Janukajtis v Fallon, supra at 430, quoting Convey v City of Rye School Dist., 271 AD2d 154, 160 [2000]; see O’Neal v Archdioceses of N.Y., 286 AD2d 757 [2001]). Smith, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. Holley Cent. Sch. Dist.
2018 NY Slip Op 2033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Keaveny v. Mahopac Central School District
71 A.D.3d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Scarito v. St. Joseph Hill Academy
62 A.D.3d 773 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Paca v. City of New York
51 A.D.3d 991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Link v. Quogue Union Free School District
38 A.D.3d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
302 A.D.2d 493, 755 N.Y.S.2d 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-2003.