Hernandez v. Bestway Beer & Soda Distribution, Inc.
This text of 301 A.D.2d 381 (Hernandez v. Bestway Beer & Soda Distribution, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne Renwick, J.), entered March 5, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff-respondent’s vehicle collided with defendants’ vehicle in an intersection, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
It cannot be said that plaintiff driver’s conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident, as a matter of law, simply because the approach into the intersection was regulated by a stop sign whereas there were no traffic control devices regulating defendant driver’s approach. Issues of fact exist as to events surrounding the accident, including whether defendant driver proceeded into the intersection when it was not safe to do so (see Lake v Suchan, 285 AD2d 722; Devoe v Kaplan, 278 AD2d 734; Boston v Dunham, 274 AD2d 708). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Sullivan and Ellerin, JJ.,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
301 A.D.2d 381, 753 N.Y.S.2d 467, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-bestway-beer-soda-distribution-inc-nyappdiv-2003.