Hernandez v. Advance Transit Co.
This text of 101 A.D.3d 483 (Hernandez v. Advance Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[484]*484In this action for personal injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff while she was a passenger in a vehicle owned by defendant Advance and operated by defendant Lopez when it was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by defendant Joseph DiGerardo, Jr., the motion court properly denied summary judgment to defendants Advance and Lopez. Although a rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle creates a presumption of negligence on the part of the operator of the moving vehicle (see Berger v New York City Nous. Auth., 82 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2011]), summary judgment is not warranted where, as here, there are questions of fact as to whether the stopped vehicle was the proximate cause of the accident. There is evidence indicating that defendant Lopez’s vehicle “suddenly swerved from the extreme right lane to the far left lane (across two lanes of traffic) and suddenly stopped short” just prior to the collision. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 A.D.3d 483, 954 N.Y.2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-v-advance-transit-co-nyappdiv-2012.