Hernandez, Sergio
This text of Hernandez, Sergio (Hernandez, Sergio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-94,105-01
EX PARTE SERGIO HERNANDEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 661256-A IN THE 185TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced
to three years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction. Applicant filed this application for
a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court.
See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends, among other things, that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel
failed to adequately investigate the facts and legal issues of the case and to advise him that he had
the option of taking the case to trial. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to
relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial
court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 2
According to the State Bar, trial counsel is deceased. If a response from counsel is impossible, the
trial court shall determine whether counsel’s file from this case is available for inspection. It also
appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall
determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If
Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make specific findings of fact as to whether the doctrine of laches bars
consideration of the instant application. If laches does not, the trial court shall make findings of fact
and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s performance was deficient and whether
Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged deficient performance. The trial
court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to
Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: September 28,2022 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hernandez, Sergio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-sergio-texcrimapp-2022.