Hernandez, Sandy
This text of Hernandez, Sandy (Hernandez, Sandy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-92,972-01
EX PARTE SANDY HERNANDEZ, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. CR-0064-15-C(1) IN THE 139TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HIDALGO COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of one count of manslaughter and one count of injury to a child
causing serious bodily injury and sentenced to twenty and thirty-two years’ imprisonment,
respectively. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed her convictions. Hernandez v. State, No. 13-
16-00696-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburg May 16, 2019) (not designated for publication).
Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the
district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant raises many instances of ineffective assistance of trial counsel and a double
jeopardy ground. The habeas court recommended dismissing the writ application for non-compliance
because the Applicant listed many separate, specific allegations of ineffective assistance of trial 2
counsel under one “ground” of ineffective assistance of counsel. In so doing, Applicant complied
with the Rules of Appellate Procedure and this Court’s habeas corpus form. Applicant has alleged
facts that, if true, might entitle her to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).
Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings
of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond
to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article
11.07, § 3(d). It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a
hearing, it shall determine if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is
indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall
appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court shall also make findings
of fact and conclusions of law resolving Applicant’s double jeopardy claim. The trial court may
make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: November 3, 2021 3
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hernandez, Sandy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-sandy-texcrimapp-2021.