Hernandez-Rodriguez v. Gonzales

203 F. App'x 128

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

**

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United, States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner has no qualifying relative for purposes of cancellation of removal. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(D). Petitioner submitted no application for asylum and has at no time in the proceedings before the agency or in filings in this court made any showing of eligibility for that relief. Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.