HERNANDEZ, RICARDO v. CARLOS LOPEZ, d/b/a EMMANUEL TREE SERVICE

2025 TN WC 15
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedMarch 19, 2025
Docket2024-50-4163
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 TN WC 15 (HERNANDEZ, RICARDO v. CARLOS LOPEZ, d/b/a EMMANUEL TREE SERVICE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
HERNANDEZ, RICARDO v. CARLOS LOPEZ, d/b/a EMMANUEL TREE SERVICE, 2025 TN WC 15 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

FILED Mar 19, 2025 10:04 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT MURFREESBORO

RICARDO HERNANDEZ, ) Employee, ) Docket No. 2024-50-4163 v. ) ) CARLOS LOPEZ, d/b/a ) State File No. 860227-2024 EMMANUEL TREE SERVICE, ) Employer. ) ) Judge Joshua Davis Baker ) ____________________________________________________________________

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER ___________________________________________________________________

On February 27, 2025, the Court held an expedited hearing on Mr. Hernandez’s request for medical and temporary disability benefits, payment of past medical bills, and whether he is eligible for benefits from the Uninsured Employer’s Fund. For the following reasons, the Court orders Mr. Lopez to pay Mr. Hernandez’s past medical bills and pay for any additional medical care but denies temporary disability benefits at this time. The Court further holds that Mr. Hernandez is not eligible for benefits from the Uninsured Employer’s Fund.

Claim History

Mr. Hernandez worked for Emmanual Tree Service, which is owned by Carlos Lopez. On August 21, 2023, Mr. Lopez’s nephew, Camilo, who was acting as Mr. Hernandez’s supervisor, asked for help sawing a log. As Mr. Hernandez approached to help, his right hand accidentally hit against the “sawing machine.”

Mr. Hernandez described a harrowing scene that followed, testifying he first noticed blood spraying onto Camilo but did not understand it was his own blood until glancing at his hand. Someone wrapped his hand to slow the bleeding, and he recalled collapsing from pain and begging for an ambulance.

1 Camilo called Mr. Lopez to the worksite but would not call an ambulance. After Mr. Lopez, who did not have workers’ compensation insurance, arrived, the men put Mr. Hernandez in Mr. Lopez’s truck and drove around to find a hospital, eventually taking him to an emergency clinic, which transported him to a larger hospital for care from hand surgeon Dr. Todd Rubin.

Dr. Rubin partially amputated Mr. Hernandez’s right index finger and repaired severe lacerations to his right middle and ring fingers. Mr. Hernandez received follow-up care from Dr. Rubin and also treated at a clinic near his home in Shelbyville.

Mr. Lopez acknowledged that Mr. Hernandez was injured while working for him and said he tried to help him financially. He stopped though when he thought Mr. Hernandez was asking too much. According to both men, Mr. Lopez paid at least ten checks of $591, totaling $5,910 in temporary disability, and he also paid $2,571.10 directly to Dr. Rubin’s practice, “Centennial HCO” (Hughston Clinic Orthopaedics), for medical care.

On June 18, 2024, Mr. Hernandez filed a petition seeking payment of medical bills, temporary disability benefits, and medical treatment.

Along with bills, Mr. Hernandez also filed a paystub from Emmanuel Tree Service to prove his wages. The paystub showed a pay rate of $20 per hour for 40 hours of work and ten hours of overtime at $30 per hour, totaling $866.14 after federal deductions.

However, the name of the employee on the paystub was “Nestor Rodriguez.” At the hearing, both parties acknowledged Mr. Hernandez is not “Nestor Rodriguez” but that he used that name to get paid.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Mr. Hernandez must show he is likely to prevail at a final hearing. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024).

Mr. Lopez said he did not have workers’ compensation insurance at the time of Mr. Hernandez’s injury. He did not dispute the work accident, Mr. Hernandez’s identity, or the employment relationship. He acknowledged that Nestor Rodriguez was the name used to pay Mr. Hernandez.

Despite Mr. Hernandez working under an assumed name, the statutory definition of an employee “includes every person . . . whether lawfully or unlawfully employed[.]” Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-102(10). Given this definition and the testimony of both parties, the Court finds an employment relationship existed. Also, Mr. Hernandez is likely to prevail at trial in proving he suffered a work injury based on the unrebutted proof.

2 The Court next considers Mr. Hernandez’s request for temporary disability, medical benefits, and his eligibility to apply to the Uninsured Employers Fund.

Although Emmanuel did not have insurance, Hernandez is ineligible to apply for Fund benefits, as he did not notify the Bureau of an injury or Emmanuel’s lack of coverage “within . . . one hundred eighty (180) days, after the date of the injury.” Id. at -801(d)(4). He filed his petition ten months after his accident.

Turning to medical benefits, Mr. Hernandez is entitled to medical treatment “made reasonably necessary by accident.” Id. at -204(a)(1)(A). Mr. Lopez acknowledged that he owes medical benefits, and he agreed to pay the medical bills. Based on that admission, the Court holds Emmanuel, through Mr. Lopez, is responsible for Mr. Hernandez’s past and future medical treatment in the amount of $13,457.18 to be paid directly to the medical providers.

As for temporary total disability, an injured worker is eligible for these benefits if: (1) the worker became disabled from working due to a compensable injury; (2) a causal connection exists between the injury and the inability to work; and (3) the worker established the duration of the period of disability. Jones v. Crencor Leasing and Sales, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 48, at *7 (Dec. 11, 2015).

While Mr. Hernandez suffered a severe and disabling injury, he did not present an opinion from Dr. Rubin showing that he was temporarily disabled from working or for how long his disability lasted. Given insufficient proof, the Court cannot award temporary disability benefits at this time. However, nothing prevents Mr. Hernandez from collecting additional medical proof and renewing his claim for temporary disability benefits at another expedited hearing or at a compensation hearing.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Lopez shall pay for any further reasonable and necessary medical treatment, including physical therapy, for the work injury with Dr. Todd Rubin as the authorized treating physician.

2. Mr. Lopez shall pay $13,457.18 in medical bills directly to Mr. Hernandez’s providers for reasonable and necessary treatment of the work injury.

3. Mr. Hernandez is not eligible to seek benefits from the Uninsured Employers Fund.

4. The Court declines Mr. Hernandez’s request for temporary disability benefits at this time.

3 5. If Mr. Hernandez has questions about proving his claim for temporary disability benefits, he may seek limited legal advice from a Bureau attorney advisor by completing a Certificate of Non-Representation (CNR) form, found at https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/workforce/documents/injuries/bureau-services- forms/LB-3252.pdf, and sending the completed form to wc.ombudsman@tn.gov.

6. The Court sets a status hearing on Monday, June 16, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time. The parties must call (615) 741-2113 or (855) 874-0474 to participate. Failure to call might result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

7. Unless an interlocutory appeal of the expedited hearing order is filed, compliance with this order must occur no later than seven business days from the date of entry of this order as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 50-6-239(d)(3).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-102
Tennessee § 50-6-102(10)
§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 TN WC 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-ricardo-v-carlos-lopez-dba-emmanuel-tree-service-tennworkcompcl-2025.