Hernandez-Padilla v. Holder
This text of Hernandez-Padilla v. Holder (Hernandez-Padilla v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FELIPE DE JESUS HERNANDEZ- No. 05-75291 PADILLA, Agency No. A076-850-597 Petitioner,
v. MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted November 6, 2009 San Francisco, California
Before: B. FLETCHER, CANBY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Felipe de Jesus Hernandez-Padilla petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of cancellation of removal. Because
Petitioner’s case is in all relevant ways identical to the petitioner’s case in Nunez-
Reyes v. Holder, No. 05-75291, slip op. at 6053 (9th Cir. Apr. 23, 2010), and in the
petitioner’s case in Rice v. Holder, 597 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2010), we grant the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. petition for review and remand for further proceedings. As in Nunez-Reyes, we
remand on an open record, and the government is free to raise any arguments not
rejected in that opinion.
Petition GRANTED; case REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hernandez-Padilla v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-padilla-v-holder-ca9-2010.