Hernandez, Luis Vicente v. State
This text of Hernandez, Luis Vicente v. State (Hernandez, Luis Vicente v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
____________________________________________________________________
LUIS VICENTE HERNANDEZ, Appellant,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing in which he raises seven points of error. We deny appellant's motion for rehearing. However, we believe one issue raised by appellant should be addressed.
Appellant notes that the last sentence of our opinion states: "The judgment of the trial court is affirmed." Because the trial court rendered a separate judgment for each of the thirteen counts for which appellant was found guilty, appellant questions our disposition of the remaining twelve judgments.
The last sentence of our opinion should have read: "The
judgments of the trial court are affirmed." So there is no further
misunderstanding, we now affirm all thirteen judgments rendered by
the trial court in this case.
FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA
Justice
Publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.3 (b).
Opinion delivered and filed this the
14th day of September, 2000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hernandez, Luis Vicente v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-luis-vicente-v-state-texapp-2000.