Hernandez Guzman v. Mukasey
This text of 305 F. App'x 387 (Hernandez Guzman v. Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Juan Hernandez Guzman, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider, Morales Apolinar v. Mukasey, 514 F.3d 893, 895 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
The BIA acted within its discretion in denying Hernandez Guzman’s motion to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the BIA’s pervious decision denying his motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1); see also Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001) (en banc).
To the extent Hernandez Guzman seeks review of the BIA’s May 22, 2006 order denying his motion to reopen, and the BIA’s March 24, 2006 order dismissing his appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider his contentions because the petition for review is not timely as to those orders. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F. App'x 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-guzman-v-mukasey-ca9-2008.