Hernandez (Esteban) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ESTEBAN HERNANDEZ, No. 80044 Appellant,

VS.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

i'.1.:519

EL.1,1", ETROVVP1 OLE, 'REME COURT

BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se notice of appeal. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge.

On November 12, 2019, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

The notice of appeal fails to identify any decisions of the district court. See NRAP 3(c)(1)(B). To the extent that appellant's appeal is in regard to the order denying a "motion and order for transportation of inmate for court appearance, or in the alternative, for appearance by telephone or video conference" and denying a motion to inspect sealed record entered on October 18, 2019, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Parraguirre Cadish SUPREME COURT OF

/9. vor

NEVADA

(0) 1947A 44§Art.

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Esteban Hernandez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4.1t14> 2