Hernandez-Beltran v. Holder
This text of 367 F. App'x 863 (Hernandez-Beltran v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ramiro Hernandez-Beltran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez-Beltran’s motion as untimely where the motion was filed more than 18 months after the BIA’s final administrative order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
367 F. App'x 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-beltran-v-holder-ca9-2010.