Hernandez-Beltran v. Holder

367 F. App'x 863
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2010·No. 07-72651·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ramiro Hernandez-Beltran, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez-Beltran’s motion as untimely where the motion was filed more than 18 months after the BIA’s final administrative order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hernandez-Beltran v. Holder, 367 F. App'x 863 (9th Cir. 2010).

367 F. App'x 863 (Hernandez-Beltran v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft
383 F.3d 968 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)