Hernandez-Arguijo v. Garland

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 2022
Docket20-61131
StatusUnpublished

This text of Hernandez-Arguijo v. Garland (Hernandez-Arguijo v. Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hernandez-Arguijo v. Garland, (5th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

Case: 20-61131 Document: 00516349589 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED June 8, 2022 No. 20-61131 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk

Issis Yaselin Hernandez-Arguijo,

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A096 175 814

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Issis Yaselin Hernandez-Arguijo, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the immigration judge’s denial of her motion to reopen. We lack jurisdiction to consider Hernandez-Arguijo’s challenge to the discretionary

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-61131 Document: 00516349589 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2022

No. 20-61131

decision not to reopen her proceedings sua sponte. See Mejia v. Whitaker, 913 F.3d 482, 490 (5th Cir. 2019). Jurisdiction exists to review her arguments to the extent she contends that she was denied due process because the immigration judge disregarded her claims and did not act as a neutral arbiter. See id. However, her due process arguments are unavailing and not cognizable because “no liberty interest exists in a motion to reopen.” Id. Hernandez-Arguijo’s petition is DISMISSED in part for lack of jurisdiction and DENIED in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jose Mejia v. Matthew Whitaker
913 F.3d 482 (Fifth Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Hernandez-Arguijo v. Garland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hernandez-arguijo-v-garland-ca5-2022.