Hermos Linen Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Hermos Linen Co. v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 380, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 156

United States Customs Court·Decided January 28, 1952·No. No. 56316; protests 154219-K and 157850-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of ornamented articles (not wearing apparel), not in part of lace, lace fabrics, or lace articles, wholly or in chief value of rayon, and not provided for in any other subdivision of subparagraph (a) of paragraph 1529, as amended, supra, in respect of which a modified rate of duty is prescribed, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of ornamented articles (not wearing apparel), not in part of lace, lace fabrics, or lace articles, wholly or in chief value of rayon, and not provided for in any other subdivision of subparagraph (a) of paragraph 1529, as amended, supra, in respect of which a modified rate of duty is prescribed, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Hermos Linen Co. v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 380, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 156 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

28 Cust. Ct. 380 (Hermos Linen Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.