Hermitage Co. v. Roos

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Hermitage Co. v. Roos

110 N.Y.S. 976

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 110 N.Y.S. 976 (Hermitage Co. v. Roos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hermitage Co. v. Roos, 110 N.Y.S. 976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action for one month’s rent. Answer, general denial and eviction. The latter defense was sought to be shown by evidence that the premises were insufficiently heated. The record fails to disclose preponderating proof in that direction. Indeed, plaintiff’s testimony outweighs that of the defendant.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Action for one month’s rent. Answer, general denial and eviction. The latter defense was sought to be shown by evidence that the premises were insufficiently heated. The record fails to disclose preponderating proof in that direction. Indeed, plaintiff’s testimony outweighs that of the defendant.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 N.Y.S. 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hermitage-co-v-roos-nyappterm-1908.