Hermesmeyer v. N.W. Invest. Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Hermesmeyer v. N.W. Invest. Co.

236 N.W. 810, 254 Mich. 384, 1931 Mich. LEXIS 945

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 1, 1931

DocketDocket No. 130, Calendar No. 35,647.

StatusPublished

This text of 236 N.W. 810 (Hermesmeyer v. N.W. Invest. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hermesmeyer v. N.W. Invest. Co., 236 N.W. 810, 254 Mich. 384, 1931 Mich. LEXIS 945 (Mich. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant Northwestern Investment Company here seeks review by appeal from an order of the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment on its claim made by way of counterclaim and recoupment in a notice attached to the plea of the general issue. No application for leave to appeal was made to this court, and no such leave has been granted. The appeal must therefore be dismissed. As this question is not raised by counsel for appellees, no costs will be allowed.

We may say, however, after an examination of the record, that, were decision to rest on the merits of the appeal, the same result would be reached.

BUTZEL, C.J., and WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, POTTER, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. *Page 386

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant Northwestern Investment Company here seeks review by appeal from an order of the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment on its claim made by way of counterclaim and recoupment in a notice attached to the plea of the general issue. No application for leave to appeal was made to this court, and no such leave has been granted. The appeal must therefore be dismissed. As this question is not raised by counsel for appellees, no costs will be allowed.

We may say, however, after an examination of the record, that, were decision to rest on the merits of the appeal, the same result would be reached.

BUTZEL, C.J., and WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, POTTER, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. *Page 386

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 N.W. 810, 254 Mich. 384, 1931 Mich. LEXIS 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hermesmeyer-v-nw-invest-co-mich-1931.