Hermesmeyer v. Northwestern Investment Co.

254 Mich. 384
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1931
DocketDocket No. 130, Calendar No. 35,647
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 254 Mich. 384 (Hermesmeyer v. Northwestern Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hermesmeyer v. Northwestern Investment Co., 254 Mich. 384 (Mich. 1931).

Opinion

Sharpe, J.

The defendant Northwestern Investment Company here seeks review by appeal from an order of the trial court denying its motion for summary judgment on its claim made by way of counterclaim and recoupment in a notice attached to the plea of the general issue. No application for leave to appeal was made to this court, and no such leave has been granted. The appeal must therefore be dismissed. As this question is not raised by counsel for appellees, no costs will be allowed.

We may say, however, after an examination of the record, that, were decision to rest on the merits of the appeal, the same result would be reached.

Butzel, C. J., and Wiest, Clark, McDonald, Potter, North, and Fead, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

American Eutectic Welding Alloys Sales Co. v. Grier
108 N.W.2d 831 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1961)
Shank v. Lippman
241 N.W. 871 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 Mich. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hermesmeyer-v-northwestern-investment-co-mich-1931.