Hermann v. Hermann
This text of 126 N.W. 3 (Hermann v. Hermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a divorce action. Judgment having been rendered in the trial court awarding a divorce to the defendant upon her counterclaim and making a final division of the plaintiff’s property, the defendant has appealed from that part of the judgment only which divides the property, and now moves the court for suit money and temporary alimony pending her appeal.
It has long been settled that such motions are not granted as matters of course in this court. 'The record will be examined “so far as to determine whether the appeal is obviously without merits; and if it is then the motion will be denied. Injury and a meritorious cause of action must appear.” Friend v. Friend, 65 Wis. 412, 27 N. W. 34, and [530]*530cases cited. No bill of exceptions bas yet been returned to this court in the case, so that it is impossible for the court to determine these questions now. Hence the motion must be denied without prejudice to the right to make another motion after the bill of exceptions shall be returned.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 N.W. 3, 142 Wis. 529, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hermann-v-hermann-wis-1910.