Herman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Herman v. State

1913 OK CR 208, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 727, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 31, 1913

DocketNo. A-1545.

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK CR 208 (Herman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herman v. State, 1913 OK CR 208, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 727, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220 (Okla. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

FURMAN,

J. R. M. Herman and Lee Herman were jointly prosecuted in the county court of Kay county by information, charged witn the offense of having unlawful possession of certain intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same. Separate trials were had and both of the defendants were found guilty, and appealed. The conviction of R. M. Herman was affirmed.. See Herman v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 422

Upon an investigation of the record we are of the opinion that there is not sufficient evidence connecting Lee Herman with this transaction to sustain the verdict against him. The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed, and’a new trial is granted.,

ARMSTRONG, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FURMAN,

J. R. M. Herman and Lee Herman were jointly prosecuted in the county court of Kay county by information, charged witn the offense of having unlawful possession of certain intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same. Separate trials were had and both of the defendants were found guilty, and appealed. The conviction of R. M. Herman was affirmed.. See Herman v. State, 8 Okla. Cr. 422

Upon an investigation of the record we are of the opinion that there is not sufficient evidence connecting Lee Herman with this transaction to sustain the verdict against him. The judgment of the lower court is therefore reversed, and’a new trial is granted.,

ARMSTRONG, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK CR 208, 132 P. 1195, 9 Okla. Crim. 727, 1913 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack