Herman v. Peacock
This text of 137 So. 704 (Herman v. Peacock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a final decree in a suit to foreclose a mortgage. Error is predicated on the final decree, the decree confirming the sale, the appointment of a receiver, refusal to vacate the order appointing the receiver, and the decree striking a portion of appellant’s answer.
We have examined each of these assignments and while the procedure was not in every respect regular and in conformity with good practice, such procedural errors as were possibly committed were harmless and the final decree reached a just conclusion. It is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 So. 704, 103 Fla. 438, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-peacock-fla-1931.