Herman v. Peacock

137 So. 704, 103 Fla. 438, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1318
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 9, 1931·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a final decree in a suit to foreclose a mortgage. Error is predicated on the final decree, the decree confirming the sale, the appointment of a receiver, refusal to vacate the order appointing the receiver, and the decree striking a portion of appellant’s answer.

We have examined each of these assignments and while the procedure was not in every respect regular and in conformity with good practice, such procedural errors as were possibly committed were harmless and the final decree reached a just conclusion. It is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herman v. Peacock, 137 So. 704, 103 Fla. 438, 1931 Fla. LEXIS 1318 (Fla. 1931).

137 So. 704 (Herman v. Peacock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Special v. Baux
79 So. 3d 755 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)