Herman v. North Chicago St. R. R. Co.
This text of 94 Ill. App. 465 (Herman v. North Chicago St. R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The only questions presented by counsel for appellant must be determined upon a consideration of the testimony in the case. But the bill of exceptions does not show that it contains all the testimony introduced on the trial, and it must therefore be presumed that there was before the trial court all the evidence necessary to justify the judgment rendered. C., B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. People, 139 Ill. 536; C. & M. Ry. Co. v. Cope, 36 Ill. App. 97; Lindgren v. Swartz, 49 Ill. App. 488. The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 Ill. App. 465, 1900 Ill. App. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-north-chicago-st-r-r-co-illappct-1901.