Herman v. Greenpoint Barrel & Drum Reconditioning Co.

168 N.E.2d 721, 8 N.Y.2d 880, 203 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1159
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 168 N.E.2d 721 (Herman v. Greenpoint Barrel & Drum Reconditioning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herman v. Greenpoint Barrel & Drum Reconditioning Co., 168 N.E.2d 721, 8 N.Y.2d 880, 203 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1159 (N.Y. 1960).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Taking no part: Judge Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lemmon v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA
740 P.2d 484 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1986)
Zambonini v. Industrial Commission
544 P.2d 710 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 N.E.2d 721, 8 N.Y.2d 880, 203 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1960 N.Y. LEXIS 1159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-greenpoint-barrel-drum-reconditioning-co-ny-1960.