Herman v. G & L Building Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Herman v. G & L Building Corp.

4 A.D.3d 451, 771 N.Y.S.2d 694

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.3d 451 (Herman v. G & L Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herman v. G & L Building Corp., 4 A.D.3d 451, 771 N.Y.S.2d 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated June 25, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met its burden of demonstrating that it had no notice of the hole in which the plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell (see Gooding v Waldbaum, Inc., 300 AD2d 282 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant had constructive notice of the existence of the hole in which she fell (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837-838 [1986]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.E, Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated June 25, 2003, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant met its burden of demonstrating that it had no notice of the hole in which the plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell (see Gooding v Waldbaum, Inc., 300 AD2d 282 [2002]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant had constructive notice of the existence of the hole in which she fell (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836, 837-838 [1986]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.E, Florio, Schmidt and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.3d 451, 771 N.Y.S.2d 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-g-l-building-corp-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack