Herman v. Babbitt

187 P. 576, 21 Ariz. 257, 1920 Ariz. LEXIS 102
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 25, 1920
DocketCivil No. 1628
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 187 P. 576 (Herman v. Babbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herman v. Babbitt, 187 P. 576, 21 Ariz. 257, 1920 Ariz. LEXIS 102 (Ark. 1920).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case was taken from the following order:

“Both parties appearing by respective counsel, Francis D. Crable appearing for plaintiffs, and Jones & Jones for defendant, and defendant’s amended demurrer to the complaint is heard and by the court overruled. Defendant has until July 9, 1917, to plead further. Thereupon, jury is demanded by defendant, dated July 2, 1917.”

No further order seems to have been made in the lower court in the cause, and no final judgment appears in the record. We have held in Navajo-Apache Bank & Trust Co., W. H. Burbage & F. N. Nelson, Appellants, v. Caroline Desmont and William E. Wahl, Appellees, 17 Ariz. 472, 154 Pac. 206, that an order overruling a demurrer is not such a final [258]*258determinative order as to be the subject of appeal and separate review.

To the same effect is the case of Hollingsworth v. Gazette Printing Co., ante, p. 51, 185 Pac. 359.

Upon the authority of the foregoing cases, this appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Phoenix v. Jones
189 P. 242 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 P. 576, 21 Ariz. 257, 1920 Ariz. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-v-babbitt-ariz-1920.