Herman T. Stichman v. General Grievance Committee Of The Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen

267 F.2d 941, 44 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2444, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4792
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 22, 1959·No. 25676_1·Published

Opinion

267 F.2d 941

Herman T. STICHMAN, Trustee of Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
Company, Debtor, Appellee,
v.
GENERAL GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD
TRAINMEN, Hudson& Manhattan Railroad Company;
Lloyd G. Hatler; William Sporer; and
Francis De-Avis, Appellants.

No. 349, Docket 25676.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1959.
Decided June 22, 1959.

Arnold B. Elkind, of Zelenko & Elkind, New York City (Zelenko & Elkind, and Paul H. Kirwin, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.

Emanuel Dannett, of McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Golub, New York City (McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Golub, William W. Golub and Bernard Buchholz, New York City, on the brief), for the Trustee of the Debtor.

Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On Judge Dawson's lucid and well-reasoned opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1959, 172 F.Supp. 329, the order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herman T. Stichman v. General Grievance Committee Of The Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen, 267 F.2d 941, 44 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2444, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4792 (2d Cir. 1959).

267 F.2d 941 (Herman T. Stichman v. General Grievance Committee Of The Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company
172 F. Supp. 329 (S.D. New York, 1959)