Herman T. Stichman v. General Grievance Committee Of The Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen
This text of 267 F.2d 941 (Herman T. Stichman v. General Grievance Committee Of The Brotherhood Of Railroad Trainmen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
267 F.2d 941
Herman T. STICHMAN, Trustee of Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
Company, Debtor, Appellee,
v.
GENERAL GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD
TRAINMEN, Hudson& Manhattan Railroad Company;
Lloyd G. Hatler; William Sporer; and
Francis De-Avis, Appellants.
No. 349, Docket 25676.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued June 10, 1959.
Decided June 22, 1959.
Arnold B. Elkind, of Zelenko & Elkind, New York City (Zelenko & Elkind, and Paul H. Kirwin, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.
Emanuel Dannett, of McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Golub, New York City (McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Golub, William W. Golub and Bernard Buchholz, New York City, on the brief), for the Trustee of the Debtor.
Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On Judge Dawson's lucid and well-reasoned opinion below, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1959, 172 F.Supp. 329, the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 F.2d 941, 44 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2444, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-t-stichman-v-general-grievance-committee-of-the-brotherhood-of-ca2-1959.