HERMAN SHAW v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
HERMAN SHAW, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D21-1859
[September 1, 2021]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Tim Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-023020CF10A.
Herman Shaw, Avon Park, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010), and Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), do not apply to offenders eighteen years of age or older at the time of the offense. Jean-Michel v. State, 96 So. 3d 1043, 1045 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).
DAMOORGIAN, LEVINE and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
HERMAN SHAW v. STATE OF FLORIDA (HERMAN SHAW v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.