Herman Paulson v. Daniel McDermott

Eighth Circuit

Herman Paulson v. Daniel McDermott

697 F. App'x 468

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 8, 2017

Docket17-1093

StatusUnpublished

This text of 697 F. App'x 468 (Herman Paulson v. Daniel McDermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Herman Paulson v. Daniel McDermott, 697 F. App'x 468 (8th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Herman Paulson appeals after the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court’s 1 denial of his post-judgment motions in his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See In re Vote, 276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles L. Nail, Jr., Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Herman Paulson appeals after the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the bankruptcy court’s 1 denial of his post-judgment motions in his Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See In re Vote, 276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Charles L. Nail, Jr., Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Dakota.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

697 F. App'x 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-paulson-v-daniel-mcdermott-ca8-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack