Herman Miller v. Pawnee Leasing Corporation
This text of Herman Miller v. Pawnee Leasing Corporation (Herman Miller v. Pawnee Leasing Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Herman Miller v. Pawnee Leasing Corporation
Appellate case number: 01-18-00429-CV
Trial court case number: 2016-007112-3
Trial court: County Court at law No. 3 of Tarrant County
Appellant, Herman Miller, has filed an “Application of Non-Resident Attorney For Admission Pro Hac Vice.” Pursuant to Rule XIX of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar of Texas, if a non-resident attorney seeks to participate in proceedings in Texas, he shall file a motion containing: “a list of all cases and causes, including cause number and caption, in Texas courts in which the non-resident attorney has appeared or sought leave to appear or participate within the past two years.” TEX. RULES GOVERN. BAR ADM’N R. XIX(a) (West 2018). Appellant’s motion does not address this requirement. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion. Nevertheless, we will consider an amended motion for admission that complies with Rule XIX. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: June 12, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herman Miller v. Pawnee Leasing Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-miller-v-pawnee-leasing-corporation-texapp-2018.