Herman, M., Pet v. Russo, D.
This text of Herman, M., Pet v. Russo, D. (Herman, M., Pet v. Russo, D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MARY HERMAN, : No. 618 MAL 2015 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : DONALD P. RUSSO, ESQ. D/B/A LAW : OFFICES OF DONALD RUSSO, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 9th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Justice Eakin and Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or
decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herman, M., Pet v. Russo, D., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-m-pet-v-russo-d-pa-2016.