Herman Lee Kindred v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 20, 2026·No. 03-24-00473-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00473-CR

Herman Lee Kindred, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 24CCR01048,

THE HONORABLE JOHN MICHAEL MISCHTIAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Herman Lee Kindred guilty of assault family violence, and the trial court sentenced him to one year in county jail. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1).

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that she sent copies of the motion and brief to appellant, provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the appellate record, and advised appellant of his rights to examine the appellate record, file a pro se brief, and pursue discretionary review following the resolution of the appeal in this Court. See Kelly

v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Appellant filed a pro se response with the Court on July 9, 2025.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including the record of the proceedings below, appellate counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se response, and we find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Maggie Ellis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis Affirmed Filed: March 20, 2026 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herman Lee Kindred v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2026).

Herman Lee Kindred v. the State of Texas (Herman Lee Kindred v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Garner v. State
300 S.W.3d 763 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)