Herman Lee Kindred v. the State of Texas

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: March 20, 2026
• Docket: 03-24-00473-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00473-CR

Herman Lee Kindred, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY NO. 24CCR01048, THE HONORABLE JOHN MICHAEL MISCHTIAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Herman Lee Kindred guilty of assault family violence, and the trial

court sentenced him to one year in county jail. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.01(a)(1).

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by

a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the

requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court that she sent copies of

the motion and brief to appellant, provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the appellate

record, and advised appellant of his rights to examine the appellate record, file a pro se brief, and

pursue discretionary review following the resolution of the appeal in this Court. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744.

Appellant filed a pro se response with the Court on July 9, 2025.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including the record of

the proceedings below, appellate counsel’s brief, and appellant’s pro se response, and we find no

reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State,

178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record

presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review, and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court’s judgment of

conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________ Maggie Ellis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis

Affirmed

Filed: March 20, 2026

Do Not Publish