Herman Lee Kindred v. State
This text of Herman Lee Kindred v. State (Herman Lee Kindred v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-15-00776-CR NO. 03-15-00777-CR NO. 03-15-00778-CR
Herman Lee Kindred, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF BELL COUNTY NOS. 2C84,62611, 2C88-84642 & 2C10-00468 HONORABLE JOHN MICHAEL MISCHTIAN, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In the above causes, appellant Herman Lee Kindred has filed notices of appeal from
his 1984, 1989, and 2010 judgments of conviction for the offense of theft. In criminal cases, the
notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in
open court.1 Kindred’s notices of appeal were filed well beyond the 30-day deadline. Absent
a timely filed notice of appeal, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of these appeals in any manner
other than by dismissing them for want of jurisdiction.2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for
want of jurisdiction.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). 2 See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). __________________________________________
Bob Pemberton, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Bourland
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: January 14, 2016
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herman Lee Kindred v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-lee-kindred-v-state-texapp-2016.