Herman L. Belvin v. State
This text of Herman L. Belvin v. State (Herman L. Belvin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant pleaded guilty to delivering less than one gram of cocaine. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (b) (West Supp. 2003). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at state jail incarceration for five years, as called for in a plea bargain agreement. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal.
Appellant's notice of appeal does not comply with former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3), in effect when he perfected his appeal. See former Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(2) (since amended effective January 1, 2003). Appellant did not amend the notice of appeal after notice from this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(f), 37.1. Appellant's notice of appeal fails to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Whitt v. State, 45 S.W.3d 274, 275 (Tex. App.--Austin 2001, no pet.); see also Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 79 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).
The appeal is dismissed.
__________________________________________
W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
Dismissed
Filed: May 8, 2003
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Herman L. Belvin v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-l-belvin-v-state-texapp-2003.