Herman E. Harston v. P.L. Huffman Jimmy L. Hylton, Herman E. Harston v. Chris Peterson Principal Umberger Mr. St. John

74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38827
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 1996
Docket95-7119
StatusPublished

This text of 74 F.3d 1231 (Herman E. Harston v. P.L. Huffman Jimmy L. Hylton, Herman E. Harston v. Chris Peterson Principal Umberger Mr. St. John) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herman E. Harston v. P.L. Huffman Jimmy L. Hylton, Herman E. Harston v. Chris Peterson Principal Umberger Mr. St. John, 74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38827 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

74 F.3d 1231
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Herman E. HARSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
P.L. HUFFMAN; Jimmy L. Hylton, Defendants-Appellees.
Herman E. HARSTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Chris PETERSON; Principal Umberger; Mr. St. John,
Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 95-7119, 95-7652.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 11, 1996.
Decided: January 23, 1996.

Herman E. Harston, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA; Peter Duane Vieth, Wooten & Hart, P.C., Roanoke, VA, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harston v. Huffman, No. CA-94-788-R; Harston v. Peterson, No. CA-94-175 (W.D.Va. July 11, 1995; June 15, 1995, and Oct. 10, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 F.3d 1231, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 38827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-e-harston-v-pl-huffman-jimmy-l-hylton-herma-ca4-1996.