Herman Deline Kneeland v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-08-019-CR
MERRY KUBICEK APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM THE 367 TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
----------
We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT , WALKER , and MCCOY, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: December 23, 2008
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herman Deline Kneeland v. State (Herman Deline Kneeland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.