Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro.

133 Misc. 722, 233 N.Y.S. 587, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 724
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 28, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Apart from the provisions of section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act, which did not go into effect until September first following the trial, the evidence sufficed to permit the introduction in evidence as against the individual defendants of the entries in the books of account of the defendant corporation affecting the assigned accounts. (Leonard v. Faber, 52 App. Div. 495, 499; Hotopp v. Huber, 160 N. Y. 524, 529, 530.)

Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Peters, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro., 133 Misc. 722, 233 N.Y.S. 587, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

133 Misc. 722 (Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hotopp v. . Huber
55 N.E. 206 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Leonard v. Faber
52 A.D. 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)