Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro.

133 Misc. 722, 233 N.Y.S. 587, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 724
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 28, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 133 Misc. 722 (Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro., 133 Misc. 722, 233 N.Y.S. 587, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Apart from the provisions of section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act, which did not go into effect until September first following the trial, the evidence sufficed to permit the introduction in evidence as against the individual defendants of the entries in the books of account of the defendant corporation affecting the assigned accounts. (Leonard v. Faber, 52 App. Div. 495, 499; Hotopp v. Huber, 160 N. Y. 524, 529, 530.)

Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Peters, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hotopp v. . Huber
55 N.E. 206 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Leonard v. Faber
52 A.D. 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 Misc. 722, 233 N.Y.S. 587, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-apfelbaum-inc-v-abraham-keizer-bro-nyappterm-1929.