Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro.
This text of 133 Misc. 722 (Herman Apfelbaum, Inc. v. Abraham Keizer & Bro.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Apart from the provisions of section 374-a of the Civil Practice Act, which did not go into effect until September first following the trial, the evidence sufficed to permit the introduction in evidence as against the individual defendants of the entries in the books of account of the defendant corporation affecting the assigned accounts. (Leonard v. Faber, 52 App. Div. 495, 499; Hotopp v. Huber, 160 N. Y. 524, 529, 530.)
Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Peters, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 Misc. 722, 233 N.Y.S. 587, 1929 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herman-apfelbaum-inc-v-abraham-keizer-bro-nyappterm-1929.