Herkimer v. Daines

83 A.D.3d 1510, 921 N.Y.S.2d 584
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 29, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 83 A.D.3d 1510 (Herkimer v. Daines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herkimer v. Daines, 83 A.D.3d 1510, 921 N.Y.S.2d 584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Michael E. Daley, J.), entered May 3, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, among other things, granted the petition and directed respondents to reimburse petitioner the sum of $692,296.37.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating subparagraph (B) of the second decretal paragraph and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs (see Matter of County of St. Lawrence v Daines, 81 AD3d 212 [2011]; Matter of County of Niagara v Daines, 79 AD3d 1702, 1705-1706 [2010]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Lindley, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA v. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., NIRAV R.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
County of Chautauqua v. Shah
126 A.D.3d 1317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
COUNTY OF NIAGARA v. DAINES, RICHARD F.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
County of Niagara v. Daines
91 A.D.3d 1288 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A.D.3d 1510, 921 N.Y.S.2d 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herkimer-v-daines-nyappdiv-2011.