Herkimer County Bank v. Devereux

5 Hill & Den. 9
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1843·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When the party who is to furnish the papers has noticed the cause for argument without serving a copy of the papers in due time, the other party may move to strike the cause off the calendar without noticing it himself. But when the cause has not been noticed by the party who is to furnish the papers, the other party must show, in his affidavit for the motion, that he has noticed the cause for argument. When he states that fact, it is not necessary that he should add that the cause is on the calendar." It is enough that it appears upon the calendar at the time the motion is made.

Motion granted.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Herkimer County Bank v. Devereux, 5 Hill & Den. 9 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).

5 Hill & Den. 9 (Herkimer County Bank v. Devereux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lightbody v. Potter
10 Wend. 534 (New York Supreme Court, 1833)