Herkimer County Bank v. Devereux

5 Hill & Den. 9
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1843
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Hill & Den. 9 (Herkimer County Bank v. Devereux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Herkimer County Bank v. Devereux, 5 Hill & Den. 9 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1843).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When the party who is to furnish the papers has noticed the cause for argument without serving a copy of the papers in due time, the other party may move to strike the cause off the calendar without noticing it himself. But when the cause has not been noticed by the party who is to furnish the papers, the other party must show, in his affidavit for the motion, that he has noticed the cause for argument. When he states that fact, it is not necessary that he should add that the cause is on the calendar." It is enough that it appears upon the calendar at the time the motion is made.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lightbody v. Potter
10 Wend. 534 (New York Supreme Court, 1833)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Hill & Den. 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/herkimer-county-bank-v-devereux-nysupct-1843.